zf2 use zf1 registry

[Norbert Máté]

Hi everyone,
  I have an old application that was written using zf 1.9. I have to
develop new features and I thought it's time to move on and develop the new
features as zf2 modules.
  The problem is that it uses registry for storing the set up dependency
injection instance. I wan't to reuse the data access layer of the old app
and to be able to do this I setup the DI and save it in the old Registry:
\Zend_Registry::set('di',$di);

I do this in the Module.php.
The problem is that if I want to get the DI instance in the other parts of
the project like in a controller with \Zend_Registry::get('di'); what I get
back does not remembers the DI settings. It's like it is overwritten but I
have put a breakpoint in the Zend_Registry::set function and it is called a
single time.

Probably I will change the registry to Service manager but I can't find out
the Registry why does not work.

Do you have any idea?

Thanks,
Norbert.

[Marco Pivetta]

Heya!

Mind sharing the module code or generally making a gist with a simple
example? It's hard to follow what is going on :)

Marco Pivetta

http://twitter.com/Ocramius

http://ocramius.github.com/


On 4 July 2013 19:51, Norbert Máté <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>   I have an old application that was written using zf 1.9. I have to
> develop new features and I thought it's time to move on and develop the new
> features as zf2 modules.
>   The problem is that it uses registry for storing the set up dependency
> injection instance. I wan't to reuse the data access layer of the old app
> and to be able to do this I setup the DI and save it in the old Registry:
> \Zend_Registry::set('di',$di);
>
> I do this in the Module.php.
> The problem is that if I want to get the DI instance in the other parts of
> the project like in a controller with \Zend_Registry::get('di'); what I get
> back does not remembers the DI settings. It's like it is overwritten but I
> have put a breakpoint in the Zend_Registry::set function and it is called a
> single time.
>
> Probably I will change the registry to Service manager but I can't find out
> the Registry why does not work.
>
> Do you have any idea?
>
> Thanks,
> Norbert.
>

[samsonasik]

try to set variable of controller via SharedEventManager like the following pseudocode :

public function onBootstrap($e)
{
   $registry = \Zend_Registry::set('di', 'value');
    $sharedEventManager  = $e->getApplication()->getEventManager()->getSharedManager();
    $sharedEventManager->attach('Zend\Mvc\Controller\AbstractActionController', 'dispatch', function($ev) use($registry) {
             $controller = $ev->getTarget();
             $controller->variable = $registry->get('di');
     });
}

[Norbert Máté]

Hi Marco,
thanks for you reply.
I have tried to make a sample application where I can show you what is the
problem but in the sample app was no problem. So probably I did something
wrong but I have changed since than and I am using service manager instead
of registry.

Thanks,
Norbert.


On 4 July 2013 21:32, Marco Pivetta <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Heya!
>
> Mind sharing the module code or generally making a gist with a simple
> example? It's hard to follow what is going on :)
>
> Marco Pivetta
>
> http://twitter.com/Ocramius
>
> http://ocramius.github.com/
>
>
> On 4 July 2013 19:51, Norbert Máté <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>   I have an old application that was written using zf 1.9. I have to
>> develop new features and I thought it's time to move on and develop the
>> new
>> features as zf2 modules.
>>   The problem is that it uses registry for storing the set up dependency
>> injection instance. I wan't to reuse the data access layer of the old app
>> and to be able to do this I setup the DI and save it in the old Registry:
>> \Zend_Registry::set('di',$di);
>>
>> I do this in the Module.php.
>> The problem is that if I want to get the DI instance in the other parts of
>> the project like in a controller with \Zend_Registry::get('di'); what I
>> get
>> back does not remembers the DI settings. It's like it is overwritten but I
>> have put a breakpoint in the Zend_Registry::set function and it is called
>> a
>> single time.
>>
>> Probably I will change the registry to Service manager but I can't find
>> out
>> the Registry why does not work.
>>
>> Do you have any idea?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Norbert.
>>
>
>

[wingman]

Hello guys,

Is there Database, Table and Column Naming Conventions for ZF2 modules?
As a proof of a concept we try to build a simple system using only the available
ZF2 modules from <http://modules.zendframework.com/> .
This is my composer.json:

{
"name": "zendframework/skeleton-application",
"description": "Skeleton Application for ZF2",
"license": "BSD-3-Clause",
"keywords": [
"framework",
"zf2"
],
"homepage": "http://framework.zend.com/",
"minimum-stability": "alpha",
"require": {
"php": ">=5.3.3",
"zendframework/zendframework": ">2.2.0rc1",
"doctrine/doctrine-orm-module": "0.7.*",
"zf-commons/zfc-user": "0.1.*",
"zf-commons/zfc-user-doctrine-orm": "0.1.*",
"bjyoungblood/bjy-authorize": "1.2.*",
"manuakasam/sam-user": "dev-master",
"cdli/CdliTwoStageSignup": "dev-master"
}
}

We are planning to add a CMS as well:

- <http://www.ejoom.com/libra-zend-framework-2-cms>

- <http://got-cms.com/>

What we try to achieve is to build a simple system like one build with
WordPress. I should be able to log in as administrator and manage posts.

But different modules use different table names for the same Entities.

ZfcUser -> table name "user" - singular

BjyAuthorize -> for the same table "users" - plural

For the names of the fields we have similar problem.

At one point the modules will not be compatible.

I think we will need some kind of  Database, Table and Column Naming Conventions
for ZF2 modules.

Is this the appropriate place to raise this question?



Best Regards

Stoyan Cheresharov

[Marco Pivetta]

Heya!

Just to make it clear, BjyAuthorize doesn't provide any standard table
names by default... All configs are opt-in.

Yes, modules may become incompatible if they are not configurable, but
that's up to the developers to sort out.

Marco Pivetta

http://twitter.com/Ocramius

http://ocramius.github.com/


On 11 July 2013 18:15, [hidden email]
<[hidden email]>wrote:

> Hello guys,
>
> Is there Database, Table and Column Naming Conventions for ZF2 modules?
> As a proof of a concept we try to build a simple system using only the
> available
> ZF2 modules from <http://modules.zendframework.com/> .
> This is my composer.json:
>
> {
> "name": "zendframework/skeleton-application",
> "description": "Skeleton Application for ZF2",
> "license": "BSD-3-Clause",
> "keywords": [
> "framework",
> "zf2"
> ],
> "homepage": "http://framework.zend.com/",
> "minimum-stability": "alpha",
> "require": {
> "php": ">=5.3.3",
> "zendframework/zendframework": ">2.2.0rc1",
> "doctrine/doctrine-orm-module": "0.7.*",
> "zf-commons/zfc-user": "0.1.*",
> "zf-commons/zfc-user-doctrine-orm": "0.1.*",
> "bjyoungblood/bjy-authorize": "1.2.*",
> "manuakasam/sam-user": "dev-master",
> "cdli/CdliTwoStageSignup": "dev-master"
> }
> }
>
> We are planning to add a CMS as well:
>
> - <http://www.ejoom.com/libra-zend-framework-2-cms>
>
> - <http://got-cms.com/>
>
> What we try to achieve is to build a simple system like one build with
> WordPress. I should be able to log in as administrator and manage posts.
>
> But different modules use different table names for the same Entities.
>
> ZfcUser -> table name "user" - singular
>
> BjyAuthorize -> for the same table "users" - plural
>
> For the names of the fields we have similar problem.
>
> At one point the modules will not be compatible.
>
> I think we will need some kind of  Database, Table and Column Naming
> Conventions
> for ZF2 modules.
>
> Is this the appropriate place to raise this question?
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Stoyan Cheresharov
>
>
>

[wingman]

Hello Marco,

BjyAuthorize provides entities "User.php.dist" and  "Role.php.dist" in the
folder "vendor\bjyoungblood\bjy-authorize\data".

They don't simply extend
"vendor\zf-commons\zfc-user\src\ZfcUser\Entity\User.php" as you do in
"vendor\zf-commons\zfc-user-doctrine-orm\src\ZfcUserDoctrineORM\Entity\User.php".
They use a new class.

The Entity "vendor\bjyoungblood\bjy-authorize\data\User.php.dist" has a code
snippet:
...

/**
* An example of how to implement a role aware user entity.
*
* @ORM\Entity
* @ORM\Table(name="users") <-------------------- NOTICE - plural
*
* @author Tom Oram <[hidden email]>
*/
class User implements UserInterface, ProviderInterface

...

If we use "User.php" entity from "BjyAuthorize" and run
 "vendor\bin\doctrine.bat orm:schema-tool:create",

We end up having a table called "users" - plural.

If you follow "ZfcUser" installation you will have a table "user" - singular.

In the module "SamUser < https://github.com/manuakasam/SamUser > " and the famous
tutorial "ZfcUser, BjyAuthorize and Doctrine working together
< http://samminds.com/2013/03/zfcuser-bjyauthorize-and-doctrine-working-together/ >
" Sam is using the mentioned above "User.php.dist" from "BjyAuthorize".

So we end up having 3 tables:

* role - singular
* users - plural
* users_roles
We are not consistent!
I know the Doctrine idea "Simply said: Forget about the database!" :) I love it!
But in the case of modules we can not completely forget the database.
Some people may not use Doctrine in the modules.
If we want to build a repository of reusable compatible modules we need   Database, Table and Column Naming Conventions.


 Best Regards,

Stoyan Cheresharov

 

 

Marco Pivetta <[hidden email]> hat am 12. Juli 2013 um 00:08 geschrieben:

Heya!

Just to make it clear, BjyAuthorize doesn't provide any standard table names by default... All configs are opt-in.

Yes, modules may become incompatible if they are not configurable, but that's up to the developers to sort out.

Marco Pivetta

http://twitter.com/Ocramius     

http://ocramius.github.com/

On 11 July 2013 18:15, [hidden email] <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hello guys,

Is there Database, Table and Column Naming Conventions for ZF2 modules?
As a proof of a concept we try to build a simple system using only the available
ZF2 modules from < http://modules.zendframework.com/> .
This is my composer.json:

{
"name": "zendframework/skeleton-application",
"description": "Skeleton Application for ZF2",
"license": "BSD-3-Clause",
"keywords": [
"framework",
"zf2"
],
"homepage": " http://framework.zend.com/",
"minimum-stability": "alpha",
"require": {
"php": ">=5.3.3",
"zendframework/zendframework": ">2.2.0rc1",
"doctrine/doctrine-orm-module": "0.7.*",
"zf-commons/zfc-user": "0.1.*",
"zf-commons/zfc-user-doctrine-orm": "0.1.*",
"bjyoungblood/bjy-authorize": "1.2.*",
"manuakasam/sam-user": "dev-master",
"cdli/CdliTwoStageSignup": "dev-master"
}
}

We are planning to add a CMS as well:

- < http://www.ejoom.com/libra-zend-framework-2-cms>

- < http://got-cms.com/>

What we try to achieve is to build a simple system like one build with
WordPress. I should be able to log in as administrator and manage posts.

But different modules use different table names for the same Entities.

ZfcUser -> table name "user" - singular

BjyAuthorize -> for the same table "users" - plural

For the names of the fields we have similar problem.

At one point the modules will not be compatible.

I think we will need some kind of  Database, Table and Column Naming Conventions
for ZF2 modules.

Is this the appropriate place to raise this question?



Best Regards

Stoyan Cheresharov

 

--
List: [hidden email]
Info: http://framework.zend.com/archives
Unsubscribe: [hidden email]