Art Hundiak wrote:
> I would vote no on this. When a class extends another class it should
> imply that the child object IS A parent object with some modifications.
> Trying to add methods common to all classes to a base class seldom works
> out well in practice.
Yes, you are right. This class isn't to be a parent class for all
classes in a framework. Many frameworks have a common class for
specifics objects types (java.lang.Object, ...)
>
> Maybe an interface but even that is really not needed for such basic
> functionality.
If you have an interface you need it implements every time. This class
can prevent copy&paste programing and create clean, useful and robust
implementation.
Zend_Object isn't a good name, but i don't have better :)
--
Ondrej Ivanic
(
[hidden email])